in the house demolition administrative decision

the award are accepted forms of compensation and the amount of compensation, resettlement area and resettlement sites space, relocation and other transition mode and the transition period, but the content is in reality very often by the Administration has set itself, for example, although the State Department's \However, in some areas, some executive branch of government to ensure the smooth progress of construction projects ground force between equal entities involved in transactions. They often attempt to take directly to the exercise of governmental power by a body transformed into direct demolition, not only as athletes, but also when the referee. As the Government itself has become one of the parties dispute the demolition, which makes administrative decisions have no real meaning. Therefore, once the demolition and the demolition of these disputes requires the executive decision, essentially on the executive \proceedings required to make a ruling, the ruling at this time perfectly legal, no problem. Because of the executive before the award should not have played the role of government functions and dislocation, so the legitimacy of the review becomes a mere formality. Reasonable time to have to seek administrative review of the Court in case the final decision, ruling the content of the rationality review, or the court of judicial review might be useless.